Merkur 34C vs Edwin Jagger DE89 – Which Is Best For You?
The Merkur 34C and Edwin Jagger DE89 are both excellent safety razor options for beginners to wet shaving with safety razors, as well as for those who prefer a mild shave or have a daily shaving routine.
These were the two razors I used when I first started using safety razors. I am glad I was pointed in the direction of these, as they provided an easy introduction to the world of wet shaving with a safety razor.
Now, if I had to choose one or recommend one, I would find that easy for myself, as I am very fond of the Merkur 34C. However, if I had to recommend one, I’m not sure, as they both offer similarities and some significant differences, and one razor might suit one person best while not being suitable for another.
That’s why…………
I’m going to share the differences and similarities between the 34C and DE89, and also tell you about my own shaving experiences, in the hope that I can give you a better idea of which razor would suit you best.
Video
The YouTube video I created for this razor comparison may provide additional information, and the visuals might also be helpful.
Features & Design Comparison
One thing I would give the DE89 is that it has an attractive contemporary appearance compared to the 34C; however, that could be subjective.
Basic Specs
Razor | 34C | DE89 |
Design | Two-Part | Three-Part |
Handle Grip | Knurled | Knurled and other options |
Total Length | 80mm (3.14in) | 93 (3.7in) + 101mm (4in) |
Weight | 78g (2.75oz) | 68g (2.4oz) + 70g (2.5oz) |
Blade Gap | 0.71mm | 0.71mm |
Handles
The first noticeable difference between these is the size of the handle. The Merkur 34C has a very short handle, while the DE89 is more standard.
The handle on the 34C is knurled, while the DE89 offers a knurled option and other variations, giving the DE89 the upper hand (it’s good to have choices). Two-handle styles of the DE89 also come in slightly longer lengths, which is worth keeping in mind. I won’t go into much detail about the DE89 handle options and razor colors, as you can see more about that in the full review.
The standard length of the DE89 is ideal, especially for those new to using safety razors, as it provides a clear reference point for determining whether you prefer a shorter, standard, or longer handle. Standard is the best fit for most users!
The excellent aspect of the shorter 34C handle is that it provides great maneuverability. It may seem odd at first, but if you get the same experience as I, you’ll find it works surprisingly well when shaving.
Blade Gap, Exposure, and Angle
Three factors that I find influence the aggressiveness of a razor are the blade gap, blade exposure, and the angle of the blade.
The blade gap (based on the measurements given) is 0.71mm for both razors, and with only visible measurements, the exposure and angle look very similar.
These are both what I would call mild to medium in aggressiveness, leaning more toward the mild end.
Three-Part vs Two-Part
The 34C is a two-part razor, and the DE89 is a three-part double-edged razor. The 34C is much easier when changing blades, as there are only two parts to disassemble and reassemble.
An advantage of a three-price like the DE89 is the ability to switch handles if required.
I guess an added advantage of a three-piece is it is better for traveling and lays flat when disassembled.
Weight
Surprisingly, the 34C is slightly weightier at 78g (2.75oz) than the DE89 at 68g (2.4oz). The DE89 is longer, so I would expect it to be heavier, but that’s not the case.
I do find that added weight helps the razor do some of the work while shaving, but I found no issue at all with the DE89 being slightly lighter.
Safety Bars (base plates)
You’ll see in the photo that the 34C safety bar is thinner, and the DE89 is much thicker. The thinner design made me consider that that’s what possibly makes the 34C feel more efficient to me while shaving. These differences in the base plates may make no difference at all, but I feel they might, and it’s worth mentioning.
You’ll also notice in the next photo that the DE89 has larger, scalloped sections. These help the debris flow through and maybe guide the hairs somewhat before the blade cuts. I’m not sure if this difference in design would make much of a difference when shaving, but it’s worth noting.
Shaving Experiences
I have used both razors on many occasions and had great, mild shaves. It was hard to see much difference in aggressiveness with them.
I did have a closer affection for the 34C, but I’m not sure if that’s because it was one of the first safety razors I ever used, and I developed some sort of false loyalty.
I then conducted a side-by-side video comparison of the DE89 and 34C and found that I still preferred the 34C. I was reminded of how well it maneuvers around tricky areas, such as the mouth and under the chin.
It seemed the 34C was also more efficient on the first two passes (I did a three-pass shave). However, I was unsure if that was because the 34C allowed for better use of my right hand on the right side of my face (the DE89 used the left side with my right hand).
I finished off with no razor-shaving closer than the other. They both give the same result!
Some guys prefer one razor over the other, and that’s the bottom line. Mine just happens to be the 34C.
Cost Comparison
A standard and lined handle version of the DE89 can be picked up somewhat cheaper than the 34C, while other DE89 handle options are similar in price.
—Edwin Jagger DE89: $30 – $50 (USD), £22 – £35 (GBP)
—Merkur 34C: $50 – $60 (USD) – £40 – £50 (GBP)
Final Thoughts — Which Is Best For You?
Both razors are suitable options for individuals who prefer a mild, non-aggressive shave. There is nothing between them in terms of whcih shaves the closest and the aggressiveness.
It will come down to personal preference regarding the handle length, three-part versus two-part, and possibly the appearance. The lower cost of the standard and lined handle DE89 versions could be a deal breaker for some buyers.
If I had to choose one, it would still be the Merkur 34C for me. Doing a side-by-side confirmed this!
